Ledgy vs Qapita
A side-by-side comparison of Ledgy and Qapita — two options for cap table & equity management. Pricing, features, and honest pros and cons.
Category
Cap Table & Equity Management
Cap Table & Equity Management
Rating
4.5 / 5
4.5 / 5
Pricing
Free plan / Custom
Enterprise / Custom
Best for
European scale-ups and multi-entity groups managing equity and share-based payments
Companies with Asian operations needing regional equity and ESOP expertise
Key features
- Multi-entity cap table management and scenario and exit modeling
- Employee equity plans with automated vesting and employee dashboards
- IFRS 2 / ASC 718 expense reporting and audit support
- Carried interest and deferred compensation tracking
- HRIS integrations (Personio, Workday, BambooHR)
- Cap table management with scenario and dilution modeling
- ESOP plan administration and employee portals
- 409A and regional valuation services
- Liquidity and secondary transaction programs
- Multi-jurisdiction support across Southeast Asia, India, and the US
Pros
- Strong European coverage of local instruments and multi-jurisdiction plans
- Employee-facing dashboards praised for driving equity engagement
- Consistently praised support and ease of use on G2
- Dominant footprint in Southeast Asia and India equity management
- Schwab-backed balance sheet and US market push
- Highly rated support and onboarding on G2
Cons
- Custom reporting flexibility is limited; users want more filters
- Occasional reporting data hiccups noted by reviewers
- Reporting is rigid; audit-specific formats often require Excel export
- US presence is still new relative to Carta and Pulley